–836-986 Blanchard tally from State and local breakouts below.
Summary of State Breakouts Below
Connecticut Chatham/Middle Haddam ( 11) August start
Louisiana New Orleans (250-400) Late Aug-early Nov
Massachusetts Newburyport ( >44) Aug start
New York New York City ( 70) (Summer)
North Carolina Wilmington ( 150) Aug-Nov
Ohio Gallipolis ( >11) Aug-Sep
South Carolina Charleston ( ~300)
Breakout of Fatalities by State and Locality
Connecticut ( 11)
— 9 Chatham, Middlesex Co., Aug start. Keating. A History of the Yellow Fever. 1879, p. 79.[1]
–11 Middle Haddam, Middlesex County. Potter. Yellow Fever in Middle Haddam, 1796. 1980.
Named individuals from Potter 1980, pp. 11 and 18 (all after the brig Polly arrived).[2]
–1 Mayhew Tupper, 18, “original victim” employed scrubbing boat from West Indies.[3]
–1 John Ranney, 21, who was “employed in scrubbing the boat.” Potter 1980, p. 11.
–1 Newel Hurd, 16, who also was employed to scrub the boat. Potter 1980, p. 18.
–1 Sarah Exton, who washed clothes of sailors from ship. Potter 1980, p. 11.
–1 Elizabeth Cook, ~50, washed sailors clothes (same house as Exton). Potter, 11 & 18.
–1 Lucinda Norton, 27, seamstress, same house as Exton & Cook. Potter 1980, 11 & 18.
–1 Elizabeth Cary, 26, daughter of Elizabeth Cook. Potter 1980, p. 11 and 18.
–1 Rebecah Cary, younger daughter of Elizabeth Cook. Potter 1980, p. 11 and 18.
–3 Local clerk and two boys from Portland who “explored the infected craft one night.”[4]
–? Haddam, Middlesex Co. La Roche. Yellow Fever, Considered in its Historical… 1855, 223.[5]
Ohio, Gallipolis ( >11)
—>11 Blanchard minimal number based on Dowler. Tableau of the Yellow Fever… 1854, p. 8.[6]
— A fever (not necessarily yellow), Aug. Keating. A History of the Yellow Fever. 1879, 306.[7]
—>3 The French…began to suffer first, and died so rapidly…consternation seized…”
—>1 Soldiers sometimes died on 3rd day of illness. Keating. History of YF. 1879, 306.
—>1 “ “ 5th “ Keating. History of YF. 1879, 306.
—>2 “ generally 7th “ Keating. History of YF. 1879, 306.
—>2 “ generally 9h “ Keating. History of YF. 1879, 306.
—>2 “ generally 11th “ Keating. History of YF. 1879, 306.
Massachusetts ( >44)
— ? Boston, Aug start. Dowler. Tableau of the Yellow Fever…. 1854, p. 9. Keating 1879, p. 79.
— ? Newburyport, Essex Co., on coast. Dowler. Tableau of the Yellow Fever of 1853. 1854, p9.[8]
–44 Newburyport & vic. Plummer. The Awful Malignant Fever at Newburyport in…1796. p. 1.
LA, New Orleans (250-400) (Late Aug-early Nov)
–350-400 Carrigan. Saffron Scourge: A History of Yellow Fever in Louisiana, 1796-1905. p. 33.
— >250 Records of the City Council of New Orleans, Book 4079, Doc. 259, 10-21-1796.[9]
NY, New York City ( 70) (Summer)
–70 NYC, Summer. Griscom. “Report on Yellow Fever.” NY Journal of Medicine, 1856, p.369.
NC, Wilmington ( 150) (Aug-Nov) (Includes small number of dysentery deaths.)
— ? Keating. A History of the Yellow Fever. 1879, p. 79.[10]
–~150 De Rosset. “An Account…Pestilential Fever…” in Medical Repository, p. 145.[11]
PA, Philadelphia ( ?)
–? Keating. A History of the Yellow Fever. 1879, p. 79. Simply notes that it was reported there.
RI, Bristol ( ?)
–? Keating. A History of the Yellow Fever. 1879, p. 79.
SC, Charleston ( ~300)
–~300 McCandless. Slavery, Disease, and Suffering in the Southern Lowcountry. 2011, p.107.[12]
— ? Ramsay. Ramsay’s History of South Carolina. 1858, p. 47.[13]
VA, Norfolk ( ?)
–? Keating. A History of the Yellow Fever. 1879, p. 79.
Narrative Information — General
Dowler: “In the year 1796, yellow fever appeared in Newburyport, Boston, New York, Charleston, Wilmington, West Indies, New Granada.” (Dowler. Tableau of the Yellow Fever of 1853. 1854, p. 9.)
Keating: “1796.–It [yellow fever] appeared for the first time in Chatham, Middlesex Co., Conn., commencing in August, and resulting in a mortality of 9. New Orleans also suffered that year, Dowler says, for the first time. Newburyport, Mass., was also visited this year for the first time; and Boston, Mass., commencing in August; also New York, and Gallipolis, Ohio, on the Ohio River, where half the garrison and many of the French settlers died in ten days. It also appeared in Philadelphia, Bristol, R.I., Charleston, S.C., Norfolk, Va., Wilmington, N.C., and St. Nicholas in the Island of San Domingo, where the mortality is set down as 1 in 2; also the Island of Guadaloupe, where, out of a population estimated at 20,000, there was a mortality of 13,807, being a proportion to population of 1 in 1.47. In the same island (in 1796), out of 367 artillerymen there was a death-list of 129, being a proportion to population of 1 in 2.8. It also prevailed in New Grenada that year.” (Keating. A History of the Yellow Fever. 1879, p. 79.)
Charleston, SC
McCandless: “Until 1799, Charleston’s doctors did not call the epidemics of that decade yellow fever. The minutes of the Medical Society of South Carolina record epidemics of putrid bilious or malignant fevers every year between 1792 and 1799, except 1793 and 1798. In 1799, the society conceded that the disease might be yellow fever after all, and the following year they confirmed it. Some citizens, however, called it yellow fever almost from the start….In August 1796, the society again assured citizens that no dangerous contagious disease was present in the city. Within a few weeks, with hundreds dying, doctors were complaining that the daily beating of drums and the nightly noise made by lacks was causing ‘extreme inconvenience and distress to the sick.’[14]
[pp. 81-82]
“By the early 1800s, yellow fever was becoming accepted as a regular part of the Charleston scene. Doctors began to refer to it as the ‘endemial’ or ‘endemical’ fever, a disease generated locally when atmospheric conditions were right. Dr. John Shecut called yellow fever ‘the proper endemic of the city of Charleston.’ People sometimes referred to it possessively as ‘Charleston’s yellow fever.’
“Indeed, for many Charlestonians, the new view of yellow fever had a comforting side. The settled population seemed to be virtually immune to it. In the epidemic of 1794, Martha Laurens Ramsay recorded that ‘the reigning disorder is said to be confined to strangers and those who live irregularly.’[15] In 1796, an upcountry resident wrote that Charleston had recently suffered terribly from an epidemic fever, in which most of the victims were strangers. He had heard that nearly off of nineteen newcomers who had arrived by ship from London in August had died.[16]
(McCandless. Slavery, Disease, and Suffering in the Southern Lowcountry. 2011, p. 107.)
Gallipolis, OH
Dowler: “The town of Gallipolis, on the Ohio river, thirty-nine degrees North Latitude, settled in 1791 by immigrants from Paris, on an elevated diluvial formation then in the midst of a vast wilderness just beginning to be settled, was, in 1796, severely visited with yellow fever, attended with black vomit. The late Professor Potter, of the University of Maryland, struck with this remarkable isolated epidemic, (which he used to dilate upon in his lectures) took the necessary steps to investigate it the very next year after its occurrence, when Major Prior of the army an eye-witness, arrived in Baltimore from Gallipolis, and gave the professor a statement in writing, by which it appeared that half of the garrison and many of the French settlers died in ten days from this malady. This strange event in the desert excited great surprise at the time. The army report, by the surgeon-general, (p. 9) ‘refers to the journal of a voyage down the Ohio, in 1796, by Mr. A. Ellicott. This judicious observer was a witness at Gallipolis to the disease which raged violently, the fatal cases being generally attended with black vomit. ‘The fever could not,’ he says, ‘have been taken there from the Atlantic States, as my boat was the first that descended the river in the spring. Neither could it have been taken from New Orleans, as there is no communication up the river at that season of the year.’” (Dowler. Tableau of the Yellow Fever of 1853. 1854, p. 8.)
Minor: “In a paper, regarding the ” Epidemiology of Ohio,” published in 1877, the writer [Minor], having had no personal experience with the disease, but basing his opinions on those enunciated by the celebrated Daniel Drake, expressed himself as follows
“In the fall of 1796, yellow fever is said to have appeared at Gallipolis, on the Ohio River. In the second volume of Drake’s Disease of the Interior Valley of North America, page 285, in a note relative to this epidemic, the essay of Dr. Miller, of New York, is quoted, who gives, as authority, an extract of a private letter received from Andrew Ellicott, anon-professional observer. Volume Second, of Drake’s work, was edited after the death of its illustrious author, by; Dr. Hanbury Smith. It is a matter of regret that this statement in regard to yellow fever has been quoted far and wide on the authority of Dr. Drake. If reference be made to Drake’s first volume, page 291, it will be seen that he denies, in positive terms, the occurrence of an epidemic of yellow fever at Gallipolis, claiming that the outbreak was one of malignant remittent fever. Dr. Peachy Harrison and Dr. Hildreth, the two earliest medical writers in Ohio, state that epidemic remittent fever was commonly called yellow fever by the majority of settlers. The Indianapolis epidemic of malignant remittent fever, that occurred in 1821, was regarded by many persons as yellow fever. It is to be hoped that future writers on the subject will not quote Drake as authority for the statement that the disease has prevailed as an epidemic in Ohio. Yellow fever has never appeared in this State in an epidemic form; occasionally, at rare intervals of time, sporadic cases of the disease have been noticed. These cases, in all instances, contracted the malady in Southern cities, at infected points; and in no case has yellow fever been known to propagate itself in Ohio. Within the last five years several sporadic cases have been noticed in this city (Cincinnati).”
“In the face of recent developments[17] the writer is obliged to change the opinion held prior to 1878. The epidemic outbreak at Gallipolis, during September of the present year, is most certainly proof positive that the disease, under certain favorable conditions, may become epidemic in this State. Grave doubt is also thrown on the statement of Drake, that the Gallipolis outbreak of 1796 was not one of yellow fever. ‘History repeats itself;’ and, in the future, many writers will be disposed to think that the form of disease, manifested at Gallipolis in 1796, was identical with that which appeared in 1878. The views of the writer have been materially modified as before stated, within the short space of one year. Some little personal experience with the disease during the summer just past has caused this radical change of opinion.” (pp. 1-2.)
Middle Haddam, Connecticut
Potter: “The details of the Middle Haddam epidemic were reported by Doctor Thomas Miner in 1823, in the aftermath of an outbreak in Middletown. His interests in analyzing the event ere to determine the exact cause of the disease and to exonerate the medical profession in Middlesex county. Gathering the facts from Ralph Smith and Nathaniel Doan, two participants in the care of the afflicted, he sketched the following account.
“A ship arriving from the West Indies[18] had lost a crew member to the disease on her passage homeward. The victim’s clothes were kept, though the body evidently was thrown overboard. The villagers employed in scrubbing the boat, John Ranney and Newel Hurd ere the first to contract the disease. Sarah Exton and Elizabeth Cook who washed the sailors clothes, and Lucinda Norton, a seamstress, also contracted the disease and died. They were all members of the same household. Elizabeth Cook’s children, Elizabeth and Rebecah Cary, were also mortally stricken. It is not clear whether they lived with their mother. A local clerk and two boys from Portland who explored the infected craft one night, also died of Yellow Fever. After the deaths of Sarah Exton, Ranney and Hurd; writes Miner:
Doctor Bradford, an old physician resident in the place and doctord [sic] Hollister and Thacher, two young men who were candidates for business, departed precipitately, and did not return until all traces of the disease had disappeared; and so many others followed their example, that only five had firmness of mind and humanity sufficient to take care of the sick and bury the dead.[19]
“….the situation was that a plague affecting eleven people resulted in the evacuation of a majority of the two hundred residents of Knowles Landing.”[20] (Potter. Yellow Fever in Middle Haddam, 1796. 1980, p. 11-13.)
New Orleans, Louisiana
Carrigan: “Although the earliest history of the disease in Louisiana, as everywhere else, is virtually impossible to unravel and reconstruct with absolute certainty, one may accept the New Orleans epidemic of 1796 as the first definitely recorded yellow fever outbreak in that city. Yet the apparent immunity of many Creoles exhibited in that epidemic indicates that the malady had been present to some degree in the area during previous years.[21]…. [p. 25]
“According to Intendant Juan Ventura Morales, the epidemic broke out in late August.[22]….Throughout September, October, and early November his daily letters [Joseph Pontalba][23] were filled with commentary on the raging pestilence. From the very beginning Pontalba observed that the fever singled out the unacclimated, the newcomers — especially Americans and Englishmen — in preference to the Creole and long-resident population…. [pp. 25-26]
“The epidemic of 1796 was without question a severe one. However, exact mortality figures are not available; no bureau of vital statistics, no board of health, no systematic measures existed at that time for keeping such records. Prevailing from late August until early November, the Saffron Scourge levied a fairly heavy tribute on the Crescent City. In the second week of September Pontalba reported eight or nine victims per day….For a time the death toll amounted to fifteen or seventeen deaths per day. In the last week of September the Baron reported that after an apparent decline the malady had continued to rage, claiming the lives of nine or ten Englishmen in a single day. By mid-October the main force of the epidemic was spent, but as late as November 6 the fever still caused ‘some ravage.’ The following day, November 7, Pontalba wrote that ‘we are now predicting the near end of the epidemic,’ and after that date he made no further mention of the pestilence in his letters. The arrival of cold weather obviously curtailed the activities of the yellow fever mosquito.
“On October 31 the Intendant stated that the parish registry listed nearly 200 deaths from all causes since the outbreak of the epidemic. This figure did not include those who died outside the town limits or ‘the protestants who perished (and they were numerous).’[24] Since the fever preferred strangers to Creoles, the number of Protestant victims probably outnumbered the Catholics by a considerable margin. According to the Attorney-general in a report dated October 21, the ‘cruel epidemic’ had ‘led to the grave more than 250 persons.’[25]
“The population of New Orleans in 1796 probably was about 6,000[26]….Raging from late August until early November, the epidemic covered a period of at least ten weeks, during which there must have been several deaths each day….one might conjecture at least two to five fatalities per day…On that basis, a total of 350 to 400 yellow fever deaths for the entire period is probably a fair estimate.” [pp. 30-33] (Carrigan, Jo Ann. The Saffron Scourge. 1961.)
New York City
Griscom: “In 1796, but few deaths from yellow fever occurred in New York. They were principally in the neighborhood of White Hall, where a new dock was being built. This dock was built sixty feet into the river, with a front of 458 feet, and having an average depth of nine feet. It was estimated to require 24,000 cart loads to fill this dock, 8,000 of which, being above the ordinary height of the tides, was exposed to the action of the summer sun….At the foot of Broad Street, a common sewer discharged its contents, which were exposed to the sun at low water. ‘It will surprise no one to learn that seventy persons lost their lives by inhaling the poison evolved from such a seething mass of corruption.” (Griscom. “Report on Yellow Fever” New York Journal of Medicine. Nov 1856, pp. 371.)
Wilmington, NC
De Rosset: “….The spring and early part of the summer of that year had been remarkably wet, scarce a day having passed for several weeks without rain. About the middle of the summer the weather became dry, and unusually warm. In July the dysentery appeared, and soon became very general, proving fatal in many instances. Toward the close of August, when the first cases of the bilious fever occurred to me, the dysentery began to decline; and scarcely one new case of it occurred after the fever became more prevalent….No age, sex, or colour was exempt from its attack. On or about the 20th of September…more persons were taken ill than on any two other days during the sickness.
“The symptoms which ushered in this disease were chilliness and rigor, alternating with a sense of heat; pains in the head, back, loins, and extremities; faintness and vertigo; difficult respiration, with a tightness across the chest; oppression at the praecordia; a pain in the hypochondria and region of the stomach, which scarcely admitted the slightest pressure; anxiety and depression of spirits: early in the disease the neck and face were flushed; heat and redness of the eyes: after a few days continuance, the eyes and skin became yellow, observable first upon the upper part of the breast; the pulse, in most instances quick and full, though not hard, becoming in two or three days small and weak. In several cases, the pulse, in a couple of days from the attack, became perfectly regular, both with respect to strength and frequency, and differed nothing that could discover from its healthy standard, while the other symptoms continued as before, or were aggravated; so that the danger of the patient was not indicated by the state of the circulation. These cases terminated fatally. Nausea and retchings to vomit were almost inseparable from this fever; sometimes nothing was discharged by these efforts, but generally a yellow bile, changing by degrees to a greasy-looking green water, which was, however, often thrown up without any conatus, but by a kind of gulping, or involuntary eructation: ultimately the true black vomit, as described by writers on the yellow fever, came on….
“P.S. The number of deaths, including those from the dysentery, amounted in that year, from the beginning of August to the beginning of November, to about one hundred and fifty persons of all descriptions. The 25th and 26th days of September were more fatal than any others. On one of those days as many as fourteen funerals were counted — a very large number for a small place not containing more than one hundred and twenty, or one hundred and thirty families.”
(De Rosset. “An Account of the Pestilential Fever which prevailed at Wilmington, North-Carolina, in 1796: In a Letter to Dr. Miller. Article II in: The Medical Repository, Vol. II, Third Edition, 1805, pp. 143-145.)
Sources
Anderson, Dr. John F. Anderson. “Yellow Fever and Malaria in Early Connecticut,” The History of Public Health Entomology at the Connecticut Agricultural Experiment Station 1904-2009. The Connecticut Agricultural Experiment Station Bulletin (1030), 2010, 70 pages. Accessed 3-17-2018 at: http://www.ct.gov/caes/lib/caes/documents/publications/bulletins/b1030.pdf
Carrigan, Jo Ann. The Saffron Scourge: A History of Yellow Fever in Louisiana, 1796-1905 (Doctoral Dissertation). Louisiana State University, LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses, 1961. Accessed 3-11-2018 at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1665&context=gradschool_disstheses
De Rosset, A. J. MD. “An Account of the Pestilential Fever which prevailed at Wilmington, North-Carolina, in 1796: In a Letter to Dr. Miller. Article II (pp. 143-145), in: The Medical Repository (Samuel L. Mitchell, Edward Miller, and Elihu H. Smith, editors), Vol. II, Third Edition: New York: T. & J. Swords, Printers to the Faculty of Physic of Columbia College, 1805. Google preview accessed 3-17-2018 at: https://books.google.com/books?id=dA5LAAAAYAAJ&printsec=frontcover#v=onepage&q&f=false
Dowler, Bennet, MD. Tableau of the Yellow Fever of 1853, with Topographical, Chronological, and Historical Sketches of The Epidemics of New Orleans Since Their Origin in 1796, Illustrative of the Quarantine Question. New Orleans: The Office of the Picayune, 1854, 76 pages. Accessed 3-16-2018 at: https://ia600300.us.archive.org/18/items/65020990R.nlm.nih.gov/65020990R.pdf
Griscom, John H., MD “Report on Yellow Fever” (Paper read by Dr. Griscom, Chairman, Section on Public Health and Legal Medicine), New York Journal of Medicine (Abstract of the Proceedings of the Medical Societies of New York). Nov 1856, pp. 369-378. Accessed 3-18-2018 at: https://books.google.com/books?id=GXAdAQAAMAAJ&printsec=frontcover#v=onepage&q&f=false
Keating, J. M. A History of the Yellow Fever Epidemic of 1878 in Memphis, Tenn. Memphis, TN: Howard Association, 1879. Google preview accessed 3-16-2018 at: http://books.google.com/books?id=WEIJAAAAIAAJ&printsec=frontcover#v=onepage&q&f=false
La Roche, Rene, M.D. Yellow Fever, Considered in its Historical, Pathological, Etiological, and Therapeutical Relations, Including A Sketch of the Disease as it has Occurred in Philadelphia from 1699-1854… (Vol. 2 of 2). Philadelphia: Blanchard and Lea, 1855. Google preview accessed 3-17-2018 at: http://books.google.com/books?id=YTrUAOOJXCAC&printsec=frontcover#v=onepage&q&f=false
McCandless, Peter. Slavery, Disease, and Suffering in the Southern Lowcountry. NY: Cambridge University Press, 2011. Google digital preview accessed 12-29-2013 at: http://books.google.com/books?id=NMrqxrLAHUgC&printsec=frontcover#v=onepage&q=scdah&f=false
Minor, Thomas C. MD. On Yellow Fever in Ohio as it appeared During the Summer of 1878. Cincinnati: The Cincinnati Lancet Press Print, 1878, 138 pages. Accessed 3-16-2018 at: https://ia802505.us.archive.org/31/items/65030280R.nlm.nih.gov/65030280R.pdf
Plummer, Jonathan. The Awful Malignant Fever at Newburyport, in the Year 1796. An Elegiac Epistle to the Mourners, on the Death of Forty Four Persons, who died of a Malignant Fever in Newburyport and the adjacent towns, in the Summer and Autumn of the Year 1796 — Together with a short account of that alarming disorder. Newburyport, MA: Printed and sold by the author, 1796. Accessed 3-17-2018 at: https://quod.lib.umich.edu/e/evans/N23432.0001.001?view=toc
Potter, Lucy. Yellow Fever in Middle Haddam, 1796. Wesleyan University, WesScholar, 1-1-1980. Accessed 3-17-2018 at: https://wesscholar.wesleyan.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1089&context=middletownpapers
Ramsay, David (M.D.). Ramsay’s History of South Carolina, From its First Settlement in 1670 to the Year 1808. Published by W. J. Duffie, Newberry, SC, printed in Charleston by Walker, Evans & Co., 1858. Digitized by archive.org and accessed 9-11-2016 at: https://archive.org/stream/ramsayshistorys00ramsgoog#page/n4/mode/2up
[1] Chatham and Middle Haddam are different districts within the town of East Hampton in Middlesex County, CT. However, it seems probable to us that those who noted yellow fever in Middlesex County, were referring to just one location, differing only in whether 9 died or 11 (which we accept, given the detailed breakout in Potter).
[2] We get the name of the ship from Dr. John F. Anderson. “Yellow Fever and Malaria in Early Connecticut,” The History of Public Health Entomology at the Connecticut Agricultural Experiment Station 1904-2009. The Connecticut Agricultural Experiment Station Bulletin (1030), 2010, 70 pages.
[3] Potter 1980, p. 18.
[4] Potter 1980, p. 11.
[5] La Roche simply includes Haddam in a short list of localities which “suffered” yellow fever.
[6] See “Narrative Information” below wherein Dowler cites Major Prior of the U.S. Army, who was at Gallipolis, to the effect that “half the garrison and many of the French settlers died in ten days from this malady.” We do not know the size of the garrison contingent or how many of the “many” French settlers died. In order to include in our compilation of large-loss-of-life events we make assumption that at least ten lives were lost, and from the wording of this account, think that the death toll could have been much higher.
[7] Keating writes: “…a fever…attacked the army of the United States, at Gallipolis {1796}. The source of the malady was clearly traced to a large pond near the cantonment. When the disease was most severe, it assumed the continued form, and was accompanied with yellowness of the skin; when proper means were taken to destroy the pond, the fever immediately lost its continued form, and became first remittent, then intermittent, and ultimately disappeared. ‘The fever,’ says this intelligent officer, ‘was, I think, justly charged to a large pond near the cantonment…..In August, the weather was extremely hot, and uncommonly dry; the water had evaporated considerably, leaving a great quantity of muddy water, with a thick, slimy mixture of putrefying vegetables, which emitted a stench almost intolerable. The inhabitants of the village, principally French, and very poor, as well as filthy in their mode of living, began to suffer first, and died so rapidly, that a general consternation seized the whole settlement. The garrison continued healthy for some days, and we began to console ourselves with th hope that we should escape altogether; we were, however, soon undeceived, and the reason of our exemption heretofore was soon discovered. The wind had blown the air arising from the pond from the camp; but as soon as it shifted to the reverse point, the soldiers began to sicken; in five days, half the garrison were on the sick list, and in ten, half of them were dead. They were generally seized with a chill, followed by headache, pains in the back and limbs, red eyes, constant sickness at stomach, or vomiting, and generally, just before death, with a vomiting of matter like coffee-grounds. They were often yellow before, but almost always after death. The sick died generally on the seventh, ninth, and eleventh days, though sometimes on the fifth, and on the third….”
[8] Notes that “yellow fever appeared in Newburyport” but does not note a death toll.
[9] In Carrigan 1961, p. 32.
[10] Simply notes it “appeared in Wilmington, N.C.”
[11] De Rosset writes that “The number of deaths, including those from the dysentery, amounted …from the beginning of August to the beginning of November, to about one hundred and fifty persons of all descriptions….a very large number for a small place not containing more than one hundred and twenty, or one hundred and thirty families.” In that we do not have a number for the dysentery deaths, which, from a reading of his account seem to have been much less than from the bilious/yellow fever, we choose to note 150 deaths from both causes.
[12] See Narrative Information section on Charleston. McCandless cites Ramsay to the effect that there were hundreds of deaths and McCandless notes his believe that “the fatalities must have numbered several hundred” because Ramsay noted that between two and three hundred people died in 1799, representing a lower death toll than in 1796.
[13] Ramsay does not note the fatalities for 1796. He writes: “In the year 1792 a new era of the yellow fever commenced. It raged in Charlestown in that year, and in 1794, 1795, 1796, 1797, 1799, 1800, 1801, 1802, 1804, and 1807.” It notes the death toll for a few years wherein the toll was over 96. Then notes “In the years 1796 and 1799 it raged with its greatest violence, but has since considerably abated both in frequency and violence.” (pp. 47-48.)
[14] McCandless footnote 61: “No one seems to have recorded the mortality for most of the epidemics of the 1790s, but in 1800, Ramsay stated that yellow fever had ‘raged with its greatest violence’ in 1796 and 1797. If so, the fatalities must have numbered several hundred in each year, because he listed the number of deaths in 1799 as between two and three hundred, and claimed that the mortality was lower than in previous years. MSM, Sept. 28, 1793, July 26-27, Oct. 25, 1794, Aug. 10, Sept. 1, 1796….David Ramsay, A Review of the Improvements, Progress, and State of Medicine in the XVIIIth Century (Charleston, 1800), 39; George Carter, An Essay on Fevers (Charleston, 17966), 22; Thomas Simons, “Observations on the Yellow Fever, as it occurs in Charleston,” Carolina Journal of Medicine, Science, and Agriculture I (1835), 2.”
[15] Cites: David Ramsay. Memoirs of the Life of Martha Laurens Ramsay. Boston: 1812, pp. 132-133.
[16] Cites, in footnote 4: “S.A.” to Henry Rugeley, Oct. 20, 1796, Rugeley Family Papers, X 311/155, Bedfordshire Record Office, Bedford, England.
[17] Yellow Fever in Ohio in 1878.
[18] Middle Haddam is in East Hampton township which shares a border to the Connecticut River to the west.
[19] Potter, in footnote 12, cites: Thomas Miner. Essays on Fevers, pp. 361-362.
[20] At the time Knowles Lading was a Middle Haddam port.
[21] Having the disease once gives one some protection from suffering its full effects again, unless very malignant.
[22] Carrigan, in footnote 1, cites: Gayarré, History of Louisiana, III, p. 375.
[23] Carrigan, in footnotes 2 and 3, cites: Joseph C. Pontalba to wife, September 6, 11, 24, 30, Nov 3, 1796, in “Letters of Baron Joseph X. Pontalba to his Wife, 1796” (W.P.A. trans. Typescript, Louisiana State University Library, Baton Rouge), pp. 274, 284, 312, 323, 393.
[24] Carrigan, in footnote 13, cites: Gayarré, History of Louisiana, III, p. 375.
[25] Carrigan, in fn. 14, cites: Records of the City Council of New Orleans, Book 4079, Document 259, 10-21-1796.
[26] Cites Dowler. Tableau of the Yellow Fever of 1853, p. 9.